Valuation frameworks for crypto assets

Other / Niche

Assets that require custom classification before a valuation model can be applied responsibly.

Static methodology preview. Live data pipeline planned. Not investment advice.

Valuation Framework Categories

The model set is selected for the economic behavior of this asset class.

Custom methodComparable mappingUtility review

Class Bubble Map

Static class view of valuation gap and evidence quality.

Other Bubble Map

Static methodology preview. Live data pipeline not yet connected.

Premium to model-implied value Discount to model-implied value Model-implied parity Asset Evidence JASMY Other JASMY: valuation gap -1%, evidence 36/100 -1% 36 XTZ Other XTZ: valuation gap -7%, evidence 33/100 -7% 33 XLM Other XLM: valuation gap -12%, evidence 30/100 -12% 30 CHZ Other CHZ: valuation gap -17%, evidence 27/100 -17% 27 PI Other PI: valuation gap -23%, evidence 24/100 -23% 24 CVL Valuation Gap
X-axis: Composite Model-Implied FDV / Actual FDV - 1 Row labels keep every asset visible; evidence score is shown at right Size: FDV or market cap Border: method confidence Opacity: data completeness

Models & Implied Value

Each model states what it measures and where its confidence breaks down.

Classification

Custom Method Required

Flags assets that need classification before model selection.

Model-implied value method No composite value until comparable class mapping is complete.

Core inputs

asset purposeeconomic claimusage data

Forcing a model too early creates false precision.

Classification

Comparable Asset Class Mapping

Maps a niche asset to the closest valuation class or hybrid.

Model-implied value method Weights model families by class similarity.

Core inputs

use casecash-flow analogynetwork demandliquidity

Hybrid assets may require several model families.

Market durability

Liquidity and Persistence

Assesses whether a niche asset has enough durable liquidity for valuation work.

Model-implied value method Applies liquidity and persistence screens before valuation ranges.

Core inputs

liquidity depthvolume persistenceholder distribution

Poor liquidity can dominate all other model outputs.

Utility review

Token Utility Review

Reviews whether token utility has economic relevance.

Model-implied value method Classifies utility strength and modifies model confidence.

Core inputs

token usecapture mechanismuser demand

Utility without capture may not support token-level value.

Method Ratings

Method confidence reflects evidence quality, source availability, and token-level capture clarity.

Low confidence

32/100

Classification confidence

These assets need classification before a serious model set can be assigned.

Low confidence

35/100

Liquidity persistence

Persistence screens determine whether deeper valuation work is warranted.

Scenario Simulator

A local assumption shell for testing scenario sensitivity without live data.

Scenario sensitivity

Classification scenario

Model-implied FDV $6.0B

Static methodology preview. Changes here recompute a local scenario number only.

Source Trail

Planned source families for turning this framework into a data-backed dashboard.

CoinGecko

price, market cap, FDV, supply, and volume

DefiLlama

TVL, fees, revenue, and DeFi volumes

Coin Metrics

BTC-style realized cap, MVRV, and network metrics

Dune or manual source trails

custom on-chain datasets and methodology notes

Asset List

Assets currently mapped to this valuation class.

Asset Class Model coverage Data completeness Tokenholder capture Confidence Link
PI Pi Network Other Classification 24/100 Unclear 24/100 Open
CHZ Chiliz Other Classification 26/100 Unclear 28/100 Open
XLM Stellar Other Classification 30/100 Unclear 33/100 Open
XTZ Tezos Other Classification 34/100 Unclear 24/100 Open
JASMY JasmyCoin Other Classification 24/100 Unclear 28/100 Open