We are not the first asking and trying to answer the crypto
valuation question. There are high-quality efforts to build
valuation frameworks for crypto assets, and we will use them. Yet
almost all of that work sits inside paywalled institutional
research.
In traditional finance, different assets are valued using different
models. But across those models, the underlying principles remain
consistent.
Crypto breaks this mapping.
Some crypto assets resemble cash-flow-generating businesses. Others
behave more like monetary assets. Some derive value from network
effects. And most are heavily influenced by market structure,
sentiment, and flows.
No single framework is sufficient. Each captures a different dimension of value.
Valuation in crypto is not about choosing the right model. It is
about understanding what each model is measuring, what it can and
cannot do, and what kind of sane valuation range it can support.